The ITKO Blog: Service Virtualization and Application Lifecycle Optimization - CA Technologies

New Whitepaper with Infosys & iTKO: "Driving Better Business Process IT w/ Modern Software Quality"

We just collaborated with Infosys on the first of a series of papers, offering a great introduction to the methodologies needed to successfully pull off a long-term QA initiative across multiple teams in today's complex, distributed software environments.

You can download the new paper for free here: Whitepaper with Infosys and iTKO: Driving Better Business Process IT with Modern Software Quality

As we've talked about frequently in our blog, modern software is being comprised of smaller, more interconnected components or services, which makes testing and development environment costs skyrocket. Add to that complexity all of the individual teams, stakeholders and testers that must support the application, and you know there is a need for better methodology as well as tooling.

(And hey, this paper also looks great - kudos to Infosys' marketing designer...)

Here's the abstract:

To remain competitive, today's enterprise must be able to rapidly support new business processes with an increasingly heterogeneous, changing environment of IT systems. How does a business manager validate this new paradigm, when the old QA approaches do not mitigate the risk of failure? What methodology, systems and tools can we use for coping with the challenges of providing quality in today's agile business environments? How do you know that your CXO's business vision is matched by the quality of systems you invest in?

This new whitepaper, jointly written by Infosys' Gaurish Hattangadi and iTKO's Rajeev Gupta, will provide an overview of the tools and techniques for end-to-end testing, continuous validation and constraint-free Virtualization of today's distributed applications.

If you happen to read this one, let us know what you think! http://www.itko.com/resources/drivingbetter.jsp

State of the Software Quality Market

Recently read a blog from Gartner analyst Tom Murphy, with some preview metrics from his Magic Quadrant study on Automated Software Quality Suites. In it, Tom points out growth and market share metrics for the 16 or so players remaining in the space. Take a look here:

"The Small Grow - But HP Continues to Dominate"

iTKO gets called out for growth in the article: "iTKO had by far the most successful year cashing in on partner relationships and its relatively complete platform for organizations seeking to take advantage of SOA and Cloud technology platforms."

Mind the Development Gap in Virtualization and Cloud Approaches

We recently had the chance to catch up with Eric Knipp, who happened to be in the area (yes, we have astute local Gartner analysts in Dallas, and no cowboy hats on in the room). He made an interesting point: that the way we describe Service Virtualization was really oriented toward the "Design Time" aspect of a development environment.

That is definitely a "development gap" that needs to be minded. When I read and hear articles about new development processes, it seems like there is a wide gap between the developer's code itself (addressed by Agile, scrum, source control, some ALM) that extends all the way through integration and testing, and continues until Deployment (where the software assets exist in Runtime).

As an industry, we look at Virtualization and Cloud as deployment frontiers. That's cool, but it represents a small portion of what could be done with the two technologies working together to eliminate that development gap, before we step off into it.  

We are increasingly finding that as development becomes more distributed across small teams and separate domains, the number of pre-production development servers and test beds balloons. Whether that deployed app is on a regular web server, or a Cloud-hosted VM, it still seems like we are leaving a bigger proliferation there. It might not seem that big at first, but few real enterprises haven't already started leveraging these distributed computing resources now.

If Cloud Computing and Virtualization are all about replicating or replacing production servers, then why would a top banking customer replicate more than 1100 services and systems with Virtual Services instead of letting them keep making copies of Virtual Machines (VMs) on their network, and later, in their private cloud solution?

Short of longing for the old days of monolithic, centrally controlled systems with 1 production environment and a couple test and staging environments... business won't let IT go back to slow releases - our agility is also creating a new burden in pre-production. Of course, this applies for larger enterprises - there are many instance of new companies who are building functionality "for the Cloud" that is limited in scope and integration requirements, starts fresh, and thus, does not have as much of a burden here.

So here's my question again: If you had to count up the instances of pre-production vs. production "environments" and servers, would the pre-prod outnumber the production by 10-1? 100-1? Be honest and think about all those dev and test servers you don't know enough about to shut down... and think about all the partners that must have their own as well.

And, mind the gap before you step off that platform!